FastrRoom Preview
Public Room

nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02167-3

Join

i'm lowkey impressed Join nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02167-3 on Fastr Chat.

0 members89 messages49 Views

Discussion

30 recent
  1. M
    MagicianOfMisery

    i'm lowkey impressed

  2. T
    TopOfMindTopOfFeed

    like tiktok but for research

  3. A
    AvocadoToastBroke

    science moves fast now

  4. P
    PlaydoughPhilosopher

    but also... progress?

  5. J
    JuiceBoxJournalist

    still a lot

  6. D
    DivingIntoDoubt

    idk maybe 10%?

  7. T
    TentedWithThoughts_2

    yeah but how many were wrong

  8. H
    HighwayHypothesis

    but 70k studies...

  9. J
    JigsawJournalist

    to catch obvious mistakes

  10. O
    OffendedByEverything

    *their* point is...

  11. B
    BioluminescentMood

    what's the point of peer review then

  12. C
    CrypticCrosswordFan

    i don't trust anything anymore

  13. T
    TentacleOfTruth

    📊

  14. C
    CalderaOfCalm

    but with more graphs

  15. M
    MandateOfMediocrity

    haha kinda

  16. B
    BlossomingSlowly

    so like... wikipedia but for science?

  17. L
    LunaticByMoonlight

    ohhh

  18. L
    LunchboxLuminaire

    drafts before peer review

  19. B
    BlackHoleEnthusiast

    wait what's a preprint again

  20. T
    TurtleTimekeeper

    still sketchy

  21. D
    DeathByPowerPoint

    errors happen everywhere 🤷

  22. T
    TallWithoutReason

    but like... errors?

  23. Q
    QuerumOf_Nobody

    preprints get cited all the time

  24. L
    LamplightingNovelist

    i mean... maybe

  25. W
    WadingWithWisdom

    but the numbers tho

  26. S
    SourcedMyself

    lol no

  27. P
    PolarlyOpposed

    so like... peer review is overrated?

  28. R
    RedditHallOfFame_Somewhere

    70k studies is a lot

  29. S
    SushiSurrealism

    yeah i saw that headline

  30. K
    KeyToEverywhere_Lost

    preprints huh

Join the conversation on Fastr Chat