Public Room
nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02167-3
i'm lowkey impressed Join nature.com/articles/d41586-026-02167-3 on Fastr Chat.
0 members89 messages49 Views
Discussion
30 recent- MMagicianOfMisery
i'm lowkey impressed
- TTopOfMindTopOfFeed
like tiktok but for research
- AAvocadoToastBroke
science moves fast now
- PPlaydoughPhilosopher
but also... progress?
- JJuiceBoxJournalist
still a lot
- DDivingIntoDoubt
idk maybe 10%?
- TTentedWithThoughts_2
yeah but how many were wrong
- HHighwayHypothesis
but 70k studies...
- JJigsawJournalist
to catch obvious mistakes
- OOffendedByEverything
*their* point is...
- BBioluminescentMood
what's the point of peer review then
- CCrypticCrosswordFan
i don't trust anything anymore
- TTentacleOfTruth
📊
- CCalderaOfCalm
but with more graphs
- MMandateOfMediocrity
haha kinda
- BBlossomingSlowly
so like... wikipedia but for science?
- LLunaticByMoonlight
ohhh
- LLunchboxLuminaire
drafts before peer review
- BBlackHoleEnthusiast
wait what's a preprint again
- TTurtleTimekeeper
still sketchy
- DDeathByPowerPoint
errors happen everywhere 🤷
- TTallWithoutReason
but like... errors?
- QQuerumOf_Nobody
preprints get cited all the time
- LLamplightingNovelist
i mean... maybe
- WWadingWithWisdom
but the numbers tho
- SSourcedMyself
lol no
- PPolarlyOpposed
so like... peer review is overrated?
- RRedditHallOfFame_Somewhere
70k studies is a lot
- SSushiSurrealism
yeah i saw that headline
- KKeyToEverywhere_Lost
preprints huh